MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6913007320 · doi:10.5683/sp2/yynzjw

The Moore Farm - Integrated Project Dossier (2016)

2020· dataset· en· W6913007320 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionSettlement (finance)Capital (architecture)SituatedTreasureSustainabilityWrightGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Moore Farm, which is situated at 670 Boulevard Alexandre-Tache, has a very old and rich history that dates back to the 1800s. It was first bought in 1824 by Philemon Wright, a prominent figure in the settlement of the Ottawa area. Starting at the time of the purchase, the property was initially used for agricultural purposes. It was then passed down from Philemon to his son, Ruggles, who then passed it on to his son who was also called Ruggles. In 1872, following the death of the last Wright owner, the property was sold to David Moore. Following this, the stable was built around 1910. In this timeframe, farm transferred hands a couple of times until it was bought by Virginia Parker Moore in 1951. At this point, the farm became an important equestrian farm in the region. In 1973, Virginia Parker Moore donated the farm to the National Capital Commission (NCC) in the hopes that the farm would be protected and could be enjoyed by the public for generations to come. For a couple of decades, the farm remained unused until the NCC decided to invest money into the site to restore and rehabilitate the buildings. The site was rehabilitated with the goal of creating an eco-education center where members of the community could actively farm the land. This is the Integrated Project Dossier compiled by a group of undergraduate students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University for the CIVE3207 (ARCN4100) Historic Site Recording and Assessment course in 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→