Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crypta huntsmani Fraser, 1911 Crypta huntsmani Fraser, 1911: 19, pl. 1, figs. 1–5. Endocrypta huntsmani.— Fraser, 1912a: 216. Bythotiara huntsmani.—Brinckmann-Voss, 1979: 1226, figs. 1–6. Type material. None known to exist. Type locality. Canada, British Columbia: Departure Bay, Nanaimo (Fraser 1911). Current status. Valid, as Bythotiara huntsmani (Fraser, 1911). Remarks. Only non-type material of Crypta huntsmani exists in the Fraser Hydroid Collection at the RBCM (BCPM 976-00166-001: Departure Bay, 0 4 April 1933, trawl, from transparent tunicate; BCPM 976-00166-002: Departure Bay, 0 4 April 1933; BCPM 976-00166-003: Departure Bay, 0 4 April 1933) (Arai 1977). Fraser (1911) found hydranths with medusa buds, but no free medusae were observed by him. Brinckmann-Voss (1979) raised medusae from hydroids identified as Endocrypta huntsmani, and referred them to the genus Bythotiara Günther, 1903, as B. huntsmani. That binomen is currently recognized as valid (Arai & Brinckmann-Voss 1980; Cairns et al. 2002; WoRMS). The specific name honours Archibald Gowanlock Huntsman (1883–1973), a noted Canadian marine biologist who first discovered the hydroid stage of this species in stomodea of ascidians and brought it to the attention of Fraser.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".