MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6913027044 · doi:10.5683/sp3/r8reja

Working with Statistics Canada Data Tables in Excel / Travailler avec des tableaux de données de Statistique Canada dans Excel

2023· dataset· fr· W6913027044 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2023
Typedataset
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)Statistical analysisWork (physics)Microsoft excelResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Learn to decide which CSV version of a Statistics Canada data table to download depending on your goals and needs, and learn how to best work with the file in Excel once downloaded. Apprenez à décider de la meilleure version CSV d’un tableau de données de Statistique Canada à télécharger en fonction de vos objectifs et de vos besoins, et apprenez comment travailler avec le fichier dans Excel une fois téléchargé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0100.020
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2170.198

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisFrench-language works237,207