MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6913033778 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8284469

Animalia

2023· article· en· W6913033778 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMorphological variations and asymmetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaDorsumEmbolusAedeagusCarapaceKeelSpermathecaAppendage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key to Chalcovietnamicus species groups and species 1. Embolus screw-like, without large embolic disc (ED) hidden between palpal bulb and cymbium; retromargin of chelicerae with one large fissidentate tooth of four cusps (Logunov 2020: figs 5–6)......................................... C. naga - Embolus not screw-like, with large embolic disc (ED) hidden between palpal bulb and cymbium; retromargin of chelicerae with one bicuspid tooth (Figs 141–146)................................................... 2 (Chalcovietnamicus s. s.) 2. Body with three conspicuous golden setal bands on carapace and dorsal abdomen (Figs 105–109; 118–125); a large apical flag-like embolic apophysis (EA) present on the dorsal side of embolus (Figs 116–117, 133–134)....... 3 (vietnamensis- group) - Body covered with dense khaki setae (Figs 1–11, 29–30, 41–48, 70–76, 88–94); dorsal side of embolus lacking large apical flag-like embolic apophysis (EA; Figs 60–65).................................................. 4 (daiqini -group) 3. Males with golden setal bands on lateral sides of dorsal carapace (Wang & Li 2022: fig. 4C); embolus without distal retro-ventral keel (dk; Fig. 117); in females, accessory glands (AG) visible in dorsal view of vulva (Fig. 115).............. C. lii - Males have no golden setal bands of scale setae on lateral sides of dorsal carapace (Figs 120, 124), embolus with distal retro-ventral keel (dk; Fig. 133); in females, accessory glands (AG) invisible in dorsal view of vulva (Fig. 136)... C. vietnamensis 4. Median part of embolus bent near 90° in ventral view (Figs 97, 101); median septum of epigynum obviously raised (Fig. 99); distance between spermathecae longer than diameter of each spermatheca (Figs 100, 104)............ C. weihangi sp. nov. - Median part of embolus not bent near 90° in ventral view (Figs 141–146); median septum of epigynum not raised (Figs 17, 35, 54, 82); distance between spermathecae shorter or equal to diameter of each spermatheca (Figs 17, 36, 55, 83)........... 5 5. Embolus S-shaped in ventral view (Fig. 80); copulatory ducts (CD) shorter than diameter of spermathecae, turning of copulatory ducts very close to spermathecae (Figs 83, 87)............................................... C. terbakar sp. nov. - Embolus not S-shaped, almost straight or weakly bent in ventral view (Figs 141–146); copulatory ducts not as above...... 6 6. Embolus concave at dorsal side (Figs 66–68); atria small, diameter of atria shorter than 1/3 of diameter of spermathecae (Figs 55, 58)............................................................................... C. marusiki sp. nov. - Embolus not concave at dorsal side; atria relatively large, diameter longer than 1/3 of diameter of spermathecae.......... 7 7. Apical extension of embolus (aE) obviously backswept (Figs 60–61); copulatory ducts (CD) not obviously bent in ventral view (Fig. 17)..................................................................................... C. daiqini - Apical extension of embolus (aE) not backswept (Figs 63–65); median part of copulatory ducts (CD) obviously bent (near 90°; Fig. 36) in ventral view................................................................. C. logunovi sp. nov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5290.463

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMorphological variations and asymmetryFrench-language works237,207