MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6913036485 · doi:10.5683/sp3/naynfe

Data Quality Flags for ACE-FTS Level 2 Version 5.2 Data Set

2023· dataset· en· W6913036485 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotopologueData qualityOccultationData setFLAGS registerNetCDFSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data quality flags generated for the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) Level 2 (L2) version 5.2 data products. These data quality flags are generated using the technique described in Sheese et al. (2015). One netCDF file is produced for each species, isotopologue or parameter retrieved from the ACE-FTS spectra for version 5.2. Each file contains the data quality flags organized by occultation (orbit number and occultation type). Note, the ACE-FTS Level 2 version 5.2 profiles are not included in these files. The data quality flag files are updated monthly as new Level 2 version 5.2 data are produced for ACE-FTS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0150.015
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.476
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.018 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisFrench-language works237,207