MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6913041954 · doi:10.5683/sp2/mcll8e

St. Bartholomew´s Anglican Church - Integrated Project Dossier (2012)

2022· dataset· en· W6913041954 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChapelBattleDominionGovernorStyle (visual arts)ResidenceFoot (prosody)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Church of St. Bartholomew is located at 125 MacKay Street in New Edinburgh neighborhood of the City of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. It is a part of the Anglican Diocese of Ottawa and serves the New Edinburgh, Rockcliffe Park and Lindenlea communities of Ottawa. The congregation was founded in 1866, but did not have the money or the land to construct a church until later in 1867, the year of Confederation. On August 24, 1867 (St. Bartholomew’s Day), only six weeks after the Dominion of Canada was created, the Parish was formally organized, naming itself St. Bartholomew’s. Shortly afterward Montreal Architect Thomas Seaton Scott was engaged to design a church building for the new parish, which, on Christmas Day of 1868, held its first service in a bare and unfinished interior. Located across the street from the Rideau Hall, the official residence of the Governor General of Canada, St. Bartholomew’s is also considered to be the regimental chapel of the Governor General’s Foot Guards. Upon the founding of the Foot Guards in 1871, St. Bartholomew’s became the informal Chapel of the Governor General’s Foot Guards. It was not until the battle colours were hung in 1971 that it formally adopted the title. The original structure was in the Gothic Revival style of the nineteenth century. Low‐buttressed walls made of local limestone support the steep wood roof. One of the key features of the church of St. Bartholomew’s is the stained glass War Memorial window (also known as the Ottawa Window) that is located on the east wall of the chapel. It was designed and crafted by Irish artist, Wilhelmina Geddes, and was commissioned by the Duke of Connaught in memory of the members of his personal staff who fell during the First World War. Lack of funds during the building’s early years meant the use of modest ornamentation and slow ongoing additions to the interior. Nearly all elements within the church including bells, organ, baptismal font, cover, and cross, pews, candlesticks and many others were gifts to St. Bartholomew’s Church from parishioners and Governor Generals, lending to the initial impression of congregational investment in the little church as well as the building’s handmade feel. In 1925, the belfry over the east end and spire over the west end of the church were found to be dangerously deteriorated and had to be removed entirely due to insufficient funds for repair. The chapel was extended by one bay to the west at this time (green), and then again in 1952 (blue) with the addition of a wooden porch to protect the congregation from the winter and provide a place for Princess Louise’s bells, which had been laying on the ground behind the church since the original belfry was removed. In 1985, the porch was rebuilt in stone to strengthen the structure and secure the new belfry in the gable (blue). In 1963, a hall and vestry have adjoined the church (orange). Both of these additions were designed by George Bemi, and harmonize well with the existing structure despite their modern style. This is the Integrated Project Dossier compiled by a group of undergrad students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University for the CIVE3207 (ARCN4100) Historic Site Recording and Assessment course in 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1110.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→