MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6913050235 · doi:10.5683/sp2/kbqfn4

Replication Data for: Statistics of Large Impulsive Magnetic Events In The Auroral Zone

2021· dataset· en· W6913050235 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeaderEvent dataTotal harmonic distortionEvent (particle physics)Distortion (music)Data set

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This data set contains three files, described below. DS01.txt: SMDA harmonic distortion event times (UTC). Harmonic distortion event start times for February 2014 - October 2017. The first line is a header which describes column information. Data is comma separated. DS02.txt: SMDA even harmonic distortion data from the Tilly substation transformer as used in Fig. 6. Each event has been baselined such that the minimum EHD for each event is 0. The first line is a header which describes column information. Data is comma separated. Missing harmonic distortion data corresponding to an impulsive event are marked with all 0 values. This data set is for the impulsive-event triggered EHD Data seen in panel e of Fig. 6. DS03.txt: SMDA even harmonic distortion data from the Tilly substation transformer as used in Fig. 6. Each event has been baselined such that the minimum EHD for each event is 0. The first line is a header which describes column information. Data is comma separated. This data set is for the time periods with similar SME values as seen in panel k of Fig. 6.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→