Land to the rear of 234 High Street, Arlesey, Heritage Statement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of a programme of exploratory archaeological work undertaken in advance of a planning application for residential development on land at 234 High Street, Arlesey, Bedfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned by AML Property Investments Ltd. to undertake a programme of archaeological evaluation by trial trenching. The methodology for the work was agreed with the Archaeology Team (AT) at Central Bedfordshire County Council (CBC). The site is located on the eastern side of the High Street, in the rear garden of no.234, centred on NGR TL 19320 36748. The site lies at the northern end of the known medieval settlement. No significant archaeological features were encountered in the trench. A cobbled surface was encountered in the north-eastern corner of the trench. The suggested extent of the surface, based on the evidence in the trench sections, was 4.9m in length and 1.6m in width. Its southern edge appears to have run parallel to the northern boundary to the site. Ordnance Survey mapping shows adjoining outbuildings located on the boundary between the present site and no.238 to the north in 1901. They are not shown on earlier mapping and it is likely that this feature, which is likely to have been constructed in the late 1890s, relates to these structures. Finds observed within this layer included brick fragments, coal and sherds of transfer printed china, all of late 19th and early 20th century date. These artefacts were not collected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.414 | 0.050 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".