MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6913061003 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319493

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) deludens Gardner & Gibbs 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6913061003 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumMargin (machine learning)Lake districtAge groups

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) deludens sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 657A63A6-BF79-4EF1-A2B3-F2BE12AC0E6D Figs 12–14, 76C, 78D, 102C Dialictus deludens (nomen nudum) – De Luca et al. 2019: 4879. Diagnosis Females of L. deludens sp. nov. have the tegula relatively small (barely reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view if at all), translucent yellow-orange, impunctate, and with inner posterior margin straight; mesoscutum punctures smaller and finer in comparison to mesepisternum punctures, dense (IS <1 PD) and becoming moderately sparse anteromedially and usually submedially (IS = 1–3 PD); mesoscutum usually becoming shiny posteriorly; metapostnotum shiny with strong anastomosing rugae; mesepisternum densely punctate (IS <1 PD) and usually shiny; paraocular area with dense tomentum; and metasoma black to brown (rarely somewhat reddish, but never bright red-orange). Females of L. deludens sp. nov. are most similar to those of L. profundum sp. nov., L. rufodeludens sp. nov., and some L. diabolicum sp. nov. Females of L. profundum have the tegula dark brown, mesoscutum punctures about as large and coarse as mesepisternum punctures, and mesepisternum imbricate. Females of L. rufodeludens have the mesoscutum and mesepisternum completely dull and metasoma red-orange. Females of L. diabolicum have the tegula with at least some punctures medially (may be difficult to see if the tegula is very pale yellow) and the mesoscutum punctures about as large and coarse as mesepisternum punctures. Males of L. deludens sp. nov. have the same characters as for females, in addition to the face completely covered with dense appressed tomentum extending above eye emargination but not reaching median ocellus. They are most similar to those of L. profundum sp. nov. and L. rufodeludens sp. nov. Males of L. profundum have the tegula dark brown and, in direct comparison, the mesosoma and metasoma punctures are larger and coarser. Males of L. rufodeludens sp. nov. have the mesoscutum mostly or entirely tessellate and slightly more densely punctate (IS = 1–2 PD) and face with dense tomentum not extending above eye emargination. An undescribed species unrelated to the L. gemmatum complex and occurring sympatrically with L. deludens sp. nov. is superficially similar in both sexes, but the tegula is small and ovoid and the propodeum lacks an oblique carina. Etymology The specific epithet ʻ deludens ʼ is the Latin present participle of ʻ deludo ʼ (deceive, dupe). It refers to this species’ frequent misidentification in the past. An appropriate translation would be the deceiving sweat bee. Material examined Holotype MEXICO – Sonora • ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.30972° N, 109.25417° W; 20Apr. 2005; R.L. Minckley leg.; PCYU SBV047813. [Verbatim label: MEXICO: Sonora / 30 km east Agua Prieta / 31°18′35″N 109°15′15″W / 20 Apr 2005, RL Minckley / ex. blue bowl / Bw7. SBV 047813 // 1849C12 // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) deludens Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes MEXICO – Coahuila • 1 ♂; Boquillas; 29.1883° N, 102.9374° W; 19 Jun. 1992; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Phacelia; SEMC. – Durango • 1 ♀; 37 km NW of Ceballos; [26.78° N, 104.38° W]; elev. 1230 m; 16 Mar. 1992; R. W. Brooks leg.; ex Nama hispida; SEMC SM0342993 • 1 ♀; 69 mi. N of Durango, Highway #31; [25.03° N, 104.65° W]; 29 Jul. 1956; R.E. Beer e t al. leg.; SEMC. – Sonora • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.2136° N, 109.2136° W; 11 Aug. 2004; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 8 ♀♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3086° N, 109.2731° W; 2 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV011441, SBV011447, SBV011449, SBV011453, SBV011462, SBV011465, SBV011466, SBV011471 • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.31° N, 109.2778° W; 2 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV011349 • 3 ♀♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.315° N, 109.2728° W; 2 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV011426, SBV011429, SBV011436 • 5 ♀♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3167° N, 109.2783° W; 2 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV011357, SBV011372, SBV011381, SBV011400, SBV011405 • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3183° N, 109.2514° W; 18 May 2004; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV024134 • 2 ♀♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3183° N, 109.2689° W; 30 Mar. 2002; A. Romero leg.; RLM SBV013275, SBV013301 • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3189° N, 109.2511° W; 30 Mar. 2002; A. Romero leg.; RLM SBV013237 • 11 ♀♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3222° N, 109.2769° W; 2 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV011480, SBV011481, SBV011488, SBV011490, SBV011495, SBV011498, SBV011500, SBV011507, SBV011509, SBV011510, SBV011511 • 5 ♀♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3331° N, 109.2272° W; 3 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV011556, SBV011570, SBV011575, SBV011576, SBV011583 • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3331° N, 109.265° W; 21 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV012912 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 21 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV012924 • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3333° N, 109.2653° W; 20 Apr. 2005; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV047719 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 20 Apr. 2005; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV047759 • 1 ♂; 30 km E of Agua Prieta, Rio San Bernardino and Highway 2; [31.312° N, 109.254° W]; 10 May 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Erigeron sp.; RLM SBV031273 • 1 ♂; 38.6 km south of Ciudad Obregon; [27.13° N, 109.93° W]; 20 Mar. 1990; Robert L. Minckley leg.; SEMC • 2 ♀♀; 5 miles west of Santa Ana; [30.54° N, 111.2° W]; 10 Jun. 1961; F.D. Parker leg.; UCDC • 2 ♀♀; Arrollo El Limón, Rancho Las Lajas, 26 km E of Alamos; 27.0672° N, 108.7245° W; elev. 427 m; 20–22 Jun. 2008; M.E. Irwin leg.; BBSL FDP754275, FDP754288 • 1 ♀; Cócorit; [27.58° N, 109.96° W]; 11 Jun. 1961; F.D. Parker leg.; UCDC • 3 ♂♂; Hermosillo; [29.07° N, 110.96° W]; 18 Jun. 1961; F.D. Parker leg.; UCDC • 1 ♂; Municipio de Agua Prieta; 31.2908° N, 109.2636° W; 16 Apr. 2005; A. Romero leg.; RLM SBV142487 • 1 ♂; Municipio de Agua Prieta; 31.3164° N, 109.2881° W; 3 May 2007; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Prosopis velutina; RLM SBV073513 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 10 May 2007; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Lycium andersonii wrightii; RLM SBV074220 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 14 May 2007; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Lycium berlandieri; RLM SBV074294 • 3 ♂♂; Municipio de Agua Prieta, Rancho Las Anitas; 31.3139° N, 109.3142° W; 11 Aug. 2007; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV076940, SBV076982, SBV077166 • 1 ♂; Municipio de Agua Prieta, Rancho Nogalitos; 31.3118° N, 108.9862° W; 25 May 2008; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV083792 • 1 ♀; Nogales; [31.3° N, 110.94° W]; 30 Jun. 1941; USNM • 1 ♂; Rancho Puerta Blanca; 31.3139° N, 109.2503° W; 29 Apr. 2007; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Physaria fendleri; RLM SBV073048 • 1 ♂; Rancho Puerta Blanca; 31.3222° N, 109.0797° W; 8 May 2007; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Opuntia engelmannii × phaeacantha; RLM SBV074046 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 18 May 2007; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Porophyllum gracile; RLM SBV074434 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 25 May 2007; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Dasyliron wheeleri; RLM SBV074699 • 1 ♀; Rancho Puerta Blanca; 31.3251° N, 109.0916° W; 8 Apr. 2005; Robert L. Minckley e t al. leg.; ex Malacothrix fendleri; RLM SBV143077 • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; [31.31° N, 109.25° W]; 22 Jun. 2000; K. Toal e t al. leg.; RLM SBV001862 • 4 ♀♀; ibid.; 7 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV008452, SBV008472, SBV019814, SBV019842 • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; [31.32° N, 109.27° W]; 25 Aug. 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV137594 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3002° N, 109.2625° W; 3 May 2002; A. Romero leg.; RLM SBV066335 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 4 Jul. 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV064051 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3002° N, 109.2626° W; 19 Apr. 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV064280 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3071° N, 109.2568° W; 12 Jun. 2004; N. de la Torre leg.; ex Tamarix ramosissima; RLM SBV054512 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3072° N, 109.2568° W; 3 Jun. 2004; A. Romero leg.; ex Tamarix ramosissima; RLM SBV025649 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 12 Jun. 2004; N. de la Torre leg.; ex Tamarix ramosissima; RLM SBV054540 • 2 ♂♂; ibid.; 12 Jun. 2004; N. de la Torre leg.; RLM SBV054335, SBV054378 • 6 ♂♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3074° N, 109.2569° W; 12 Jun. 2004; N. de la Torre leg.; RLM SBV054389, SBV054397, SBV054399, SBV054405, SBV054431, SBV054432 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3075° N, 109.2572° W; 16 Jun. 2004; A. Romero leg.; RLM SBV079866 • 5 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3083° N, 109.2736° W; 21 Apr. 2005; A. Romero leg.; PCYU SBV048073, SBV048079, SBV048082, SBV048087, SBV048088 • 9 ♀♀; ibid.; 21 Apr. 2005; A. Romero leg.; RLM SBV048075, SBV048076, SBV048078, SBV048080, SBV048081, SBV048086, SBV048091, SBV048092, SBV048093 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 12 Aug. 2006; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV060698 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3086° N, 109.2731° W; 25 Apr. 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV209834 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 2 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; PCYU SBV011472 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 22 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV030151 • 1 ♀; ibid.; 19 Jul. 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV134259 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 6 May 2002; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV068366 • 1 ♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3097° N, 109.2542° W; 19 Aug. 2003; A. Nelson leg.; RLM SBV034617 • 3 ♂♂; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3097° N, 109.2778° W; 19 Aug. 2003; A. Nelson leg.; RLM SBV034551, SBV034572, SBV034573 • 1 ♀; ibid.; 8 Aug. 2004; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Lepidium thurberi; RLM SBV026385 • 1 ♀; ibid.; 10 Aug. 2004; Robert L. Minckley leg.; ex Chenopodium neomexicanum; RLM SBV026469 • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3099° N, 109.2778° W; 2 May 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV011344 • 2 ♂♂; ibid.; 11 May 2001; A. Romero leg.; RLM SBV029242, SBV029256 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 11 Sep. 2001; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV018150 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 19 May 2004; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV024523 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 25 Jul. 2007; Robert L. Minckley leg.; RLM SBV075348 • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.3101° N, 109.2535° W; 11 May 2001; A. Romero leg.; RLM SBV029274 • 1 ♂; ibid.; 11 May 2001; A. Romero l

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207