MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6913063946 · doi:10.5284/1111075

St Owen's Church, Bromham

2021· article· en· W6913063946 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavationFootprintPopulationCultural heritageArchaeological record

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to a planning condition and a faculty on the construction of a new extension and the creation of disabled access at St Owen's Church, Blomham, Bedfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned to undertake a programme of archaeological monitoring of the development groundworks. The works for the present project involved five stages of archaeological investigation and recording, comprising a rapid recording of the interior and exterior parts of the church affected by the construction of the new northern extension; a record of the gravestones located within the footprint of the extension and the affected by the works; the excavation of a trial trench; the excavation of the footprint of the new extension; and the monitoring of all groundworks associated with the construction of the new extension. Monitoring of the development groundworks has revealed over 100 human burials to the north of the church. Analysis of the bones suggests that overall, the demography and palaeopathology from this population is indicative of both childhood stress, as well as a potentially high calorie adult diet and longevity..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it