Analytical Buildings Record (level 3) at Old Vicarage, Vicarage Lane, Ugley, Essex. CM22 6HU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Historical buildings report The most likely period of construction is c.1800 at the same time as the Parsonage Farm would have been developed. The buildings were described in 1810: & detached Buildings viz. A Stable, Wood House, Coach & Chaise House, Hen House, contiguous to each other, of wood & covered with thatch, except the Hen House, which is tiled. The Buildings are in the Orchard adjoining the Garden. ERO D/P 373/3/1. 'Essex' Oakley Vicarage. 20 June 1810. Hand written and signed by Arthur William Trollope, Vicar. The Stables has been made from a collection of reused frames from various buildings. The exterior walls are made of reused timbers with some half and quarter poles added. The walls have straight primary bracing with nailed interrupted studwork with weather-boarding and lath and daub panels. The lath is riven and nailed onto the frame, daubed and then plastered. The interior has been protected with kick boards made from edge-moulded boards. The West Stable retains its cobble stoned drained floor. The building was converted to accommodation in the 1930's by outfitting the hayloft as a comfortable bedroom. The East Stable was re-floored inside with yellow bricks and a concrete pad to support a new staircase which was also outfitted with Essex board. The Stables were converted to garages. The building remained little changed but was repaired in 1992 when all the roofs were re-laid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.806 | 0.669 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".