MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6913151946 · doi:10.5683/sp3/rzaydg

Supplementary Dataset for "Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance Flux Footprints for Areas Surrounding AmeriFlux Sites"

2020· dataset· en· W6913151946 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityDalhousie UniversityUniversity of GuelphUniversity of British ColumbiaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaCarleton UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFootprintRepresentativeness heuristicFlux (metallurgy)Land coverSatelliteEnhanced vegetation indexIndex (typography)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This record is for the dataset “Supplementary Dataset for "Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance Flux Footprints for Areas Surrounding AmeriFlux Sites"” at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4015350 These datasets are supplementary to the paper "Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance Flux Footprints for Areas Surrounding AmeriFlux Sites" by Chu et al. Dataset S1. Summary of site-specific footprint metrics filename: All_site_fpt_summary.csv readme: All_site_fpt_summary-README.csv Dataset S2. All monthly footprint climatology weight maps filename: monthly_footprint_climatology_weight_map.zip the zip folder contains individual files of all monthly footprint weight maps filename: _ _ _ _fpt_weight.tif readme: README.txt Dataset S3. All site-year footprint climatology overlapped with true-color satellite images. filename: site-year_footprint_climatology_realcolor_map.zip the zip folder contains individual files of footprint climatologies from all site-years filename: _ _ _shrink_footprint_climatology.png readme: README.txt Dataset S4. Site-specific results and representativeness index based on the land cover type analysis. filename: All_site_land_cover_dominant_summary2.csv readme:All_site_land_cover_dominant_summary2-README.csv Dataset S5. Site-specific results and representativeness index based on the EVI analysis. filename: All_site_Landsat_EVI_fpt_comparison2.csv readme: All_site_Landsat_EVI_fpt_comparison2-README.csv Dataset S6. All available site-month EVI and time-explicit representativeness. filename: All_site_Landsat_EVI_all_cutout2.csv readme: All_site_Landsat_EVI_all_cutout2-README.csv This dataset can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4015350

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3320.186

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→