MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6913164510 · doi:10.5282/rcc/7745

Mumps in the Post-Secondary Environment: Targeted Advertising in the 2007–2008 Alberta Mumps Vaccination Campaign

2019· article· en· W6913164510 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversitätsbibliothek der LMU · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVirology and Viral Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaccinationMumps vaccineTRIPS architectureMMR vaccinePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following an increased occurrence of mumps among post-secondary students in southern Alberta in 2007, Alberta Health Services (AHS) began a campaign to encourage post-secondary-aged individuals to undergo a second round of mumps vaccination. Mumps in Alberta posed a significant threat to post-secondary-aged students because of their campus environment, and the fact that a majority of these individuals received only a single dose of the two-dose scheduled Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccination as children. To encourage vaccination compliance, two gendered ads, aimed at males and females respectively, were used to target the perceived fears and consequences of contracting mumps among post-secondary-aged students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversitätsbibliothek der LMUSame topicVirology and Viral DiseasesFrench-language works237,207