HISTORIC BUILDING RECORDING A14 CAMBRIDGE TO HUNTINGDON IMPROVEMENT SCHEME: WWII PILLBOX (ASSET 54), BRAMPTON CAMBRIDGESHIRE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building recording was carried out between the 18th May and 6th April 2017 and included the following elements. Establishing an accurate archaeological record of the buildings to Historic England Level 2. An overall photographic survey of the exterior and interior of the buildings in their present condition comprising general and detailed shots. Photography was carried out using a Panasonic DMC FZ72. The images are in RAW with high quality JPEG duplicates. Where possible and appropriate were included in the photographs. Written notes on the buildings' construction, present and former use and, where appropriate, the buildings' past and present relationship to their setting in the wider landscape. Production of sketch plans in the absence of architectural or survey drawings. Recording was restricted by the presence of hazardous debris around and within the structure and due to safety concerns the pillbox was not entered. The pillbox was a typical structure of its type and was intended to provide a hardened fighting position for infantry in the eventuality of an invasion. The structure was found to be in a generally good condition with no obvious spalling or cracking of the concrete. The pillbox was a six-sided structure, approximately 4m x 4m, with a wide, flat entrance elevation at the south-west, and a tapered frontage facing towards the road. The structure was simple in its construction and the walls and roof were formed of precast reinforced concrete slabs. The current scheme of road improvement works is not envisaged to impact upon the pillbox and at time of this survey the pillbox is intended to remain in situ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".