MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6913195419 · doi:10.5284/1127324

HISTORIC BUILDING RECORDING A14 CAMBRIDGE TO HUNTINGDON IMPROVEMENT SCHEME: WWII PILLBOX (ASSET 54), BRAMPTON CAMBRIDGESHIRE

2018· article· en· W6913195419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacadeDemolitionDirtShadow (psychology)ExcavationWorld War IIPhotographySettlement (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Building recording was carried out between the 18th May and 6th April 2017 and included the following elements. Establishing an accurate archaeological record of the buildings to Historic England Level 2. An overall photographic survey of the exterior and interior of the buildings in their present condition comprising general and detailed shots. Photography was carried out using a Panasonic DMC FZ72. The images are in RAW with high quality JPEG duplicates. Where possible and appropriate were included in the photographs. Written notes on the buildings' construction, present and former use and, where appropriate, the buildings' past and present relationship to their setting in the wider landscape. Production of sketch plans in the absence of architectural or survey drawings. Recording was restricted by the presence of hazardous debris around and within the structure and due to safety concerns the pillbox was not entered. The pillbox was a typical structure of its type and was intended to provide a hardened fighting position for infantry in the eventuality of an invasion. The structure was found to be in a generally good condition with no obvious spalling or cracking of the concrete. The pillbox was a six-sided structure, approximately 4m x 4m, with a wide, flat entrance elevation at the south-west, and a tapered frontage facing towards the road. The structure was simple in its construction and the walls and roof were formed of precast reinforced concrete slabs. The current scheme of road improvement works is not envisaged to impact upon the pillbox and at time of this survey the pillbox is intended to remain in situ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5250.130

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicArchaeological Research and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207