MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6913208649 · doi:10.5683/sp3/bad4qj

Wildfire Affected Lake Water Carbon Data [Québec, Canada and Minnesota, USA, 2021-2022]

2025· dataset· en· W6913208649 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSampling (signal processing)Stratification (seeds)Hydrology (agriculture)Thermal stratificationCarbon fluxFire history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains lake water carbon pool concentration responses to three different wildfires. Sampling campaigns took place once in June or early July after the onset of thermal stratification (although not all lakes were deep enough to stratify) over two years; Côte-Nord was sampled in 2021, while Minnesota and Saguenay were sampled in 2022. Sampling varied in the time since the fire occurred, with the Côte-Nord fire (CN, 128 km2) occurring 3 years pre-sampling, the Saguenay fire (SAG, 599 km2) occurring 2 years pre-sampling, and the Greenwood Fire in Minnesota (MN, 108 km2) occurring 8 months pre-sampling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→