The Tropical Greenhouse - Central Experimental farm - Integrated Project Dossier (2019)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Tropical Greenhouse is also identified as Building 50 on the Canadian Government’s Experimental Farms property. Throughout the years, the Greenhouse has been used to conduct research which otherwise couldn’t be conducted outdoors in the harsh Ottawa weather. The research done in the Greenhouse has allowed for development in the breeding of plants, and many other research projects. The knowledge of agriculture and plants in Canada is affected by this Greenhouse. Its construction date in the early 20th century has allowed for many projects to pass through its doors. The aesthetics of the Greenhouse haven’t changed over its nearly 100 year history. It has gone through many different restorations but, as an article by Steph Williams on The Record states, “The restoration process followed strict guidelines based on original materials and technologies to ensure the historic structure remained true to its original intent.” This has allowed the character and historic feel of the building. The Tropical Greenhouse offers a unique and public experience for local visitors and tourists by way of housing plant life which does not grow naturally in Canada. Ogee-shaped roof as well as picturesque front entrance. Environmental/ Agriculture based Research mixed with the park-like attributes it contributes to the Central Experimental farm grounds. This is the Integrated Project Dossier compiled by a group of undergraduate students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University for the CIVE3207 (ARCN4100) Historic Site Recording and Assessment course in 2019.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.077 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".