MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6917735950 · doi:10.58067/1gt9-1345

A Project Management Crisis: Moving a Multi-institutional Collaborative In-Person Sprint Online

2023· article· en· W6917735950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConestoga College Repository · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence Applications
Canadian institutionsConestoga College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProject managementSprintProject management trianglePhase (matter)Project managerPoint (geometry)Project planningWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case is based on actual events that took place during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Kim Carter, Professor in School of Business at Conestoga College, was the project lead for a multi-institutional collaboration project, along with her counterpart Marie Rutherford, from Georgian College. Months of preparation had taken place to get to this phase in the project. Carter and Rutherford had anticipated delays and challenges. Still, they did not anticipate a sudden stop to the project that would derail plans to the point that the resources would not be completed in time for fall delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it