Regards catholiques sur les capitales, XIXe et XXe siècles : Bruxelles, Paris, Québec, Rome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le colloque international « regards catholiques sur les capitales, XIXe et XXe siècles : Bruxelles, Paris, Québec, Rome » entend reprendre la question complexe du rapport des catholiques à la ville par le bout des capitales nationales. Comment se fait-il que, même dans des pays profondément catholiques et influencés par un clergé puissant, les capitales nationales aient été perçues par certaines élites comme des havres du libéralisme et des lieux privilégiés de tolérance religieuse tandis que pour d’autres elles symbolisaient toutes les subversions ? Il s’agit d’objectiver cette tension à partir de l’étude de différents contextes historiques régionaux en Belgique, en France, au Québec et en Italie. Le colloque se tiendra à l’Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), le 23 mars 2012. Les propositions de communication devront être envoyées avant le 15 novembre 2011 à : cecile.vanderpelen@ulb.ac.be.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".