MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6917842925 · doi:10.58079/12ife

WFW organise le séminaire commun du programme Visibilisation du LERMA (14/10/24)

2024· article· fr· W6917842925 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationSuffrageExcellenceWomen's suffrage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'équipe Women and the F-Word vous invite au séminaire commun du programme Visibilisation lundi 14 octobre entre 14 et 16h en salle 2.44 de la Maison de la Recherche. Les intervenant·es seront: Lianne Moyes, Professeure de littérature (Université de Montréal): Making visible in literature Marc Calvini-Lefebvre, MCF en civilisation britannique du 19e siècle (AMU): Hidden from history no more: the British suffrage centenary as visibilisation par excellence La séance sera présidée par Nic...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1990.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)Same topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207