Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les récents débats sur le rôle du Panthéon et les actions menées en faveur de la « panthéonisation » des femmes (voir le rapport remis au président de la République par Philippe Bélaval, président du Centre des monuments nationaux le 10 octobre 2013) ont rappelé à qui l'ignorerait encore, certaines inégalités concernant la postérité des créatrices. Lors des séances du séminaire « Genre, cultures et sexualités » qui débuteront en janvier 2014, nous souhaitons interroger les procédés ou pratiques d'exclusion des femmes mais également les questions de transmission qui mènent à l'oubli ou à l'invisibilisation de créatrices le plus souvent reconnues, récompensées et actives de leur vivant.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Announcement of a gender, cultures and sexualities seminar series on the exclusion and invisibilization of women creators; the object is cultural recognition and canon formation, not the research system.
This announces a seminar about gender, culture, and sexuality rather than studying research practice.
Seminar series announcement on gender, cultures, and sexualities; not an empirical or conceptual study of research.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".