MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6917910778 · doi:10.58079/qxmu

Congrès SHARP 2015 / SHARP 2015 Conference

2014· article· fr· W6917910778 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Limit (mathematics)Perspective (graphical)Set (abstract data type)Focus (optics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

**The English version follows.** Chère collègue, Cher collègue, Placé sous le thème des « Générations et régénérations du livre / The Generation and Regeneration of Books », le prochain congrès annuel de la Society for the History of Authorship, Reading and Publishing (SHARP), organisé par le Groupe de recherches et d¹études sur le livre au Québec (GRÉLQ), l¹Université de Sherbrooke, Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (BAnQ) et l¹Université McGill, aura lieu à Longueuil et à Montré...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.016
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207