MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6917955477 · doi:10.58079/vbcd

Le design du monde. De McLuhan à Sloterdijk, vers une anthropologie de l'espace en devenir

2015· article· fr· W6917955477 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Perspective (graphical)Identity (music)EthnographyRelation (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vincent Duclos, Le design du monde. De McLuhan à Sloterdijk, vers une anthropologie de l’espace en devenir, FMSH-WP-2015-97, juin 2015. Pour télécharger ce document sur HALSHS Vincent Duclos est docteur en anthropologie et chercheur postdoctoral à la chaire Anthropologie etsanté mondiale du Collège d’études mondiales. Il est également chargé de cours à l’université de Montréal. Ses recherches portent sur les relations entre espace, technologie et santé à l’ère de la mondialisationnumérique. I...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicDigital Media and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207