MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6918123017 · doi:10.58079/qs35

Nouveautés à la librairie du CCA

2012· article· fr· W6918123017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Class (philosophy)Component (thermodynamics)Point (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Centre Canadien d'Architecture de Montréal qui accueillera le prochain congrès Ambiances dispose d'une librairie qui annoncent régulièrement ses nouveautés. Voilà ce que j'en ai retenu. Le CCA dispose aussi d'un fonds exceptionnel de publications, études conceptuelles, dessins, plans, maquettes, estampes, photographies et archives, des documents connexes et éphémères ainsi que des récits oraux d’architectes. Et vous pouvez consulter ce fonds à cette adresse intitulée collection. Peter Zum...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0140.012
Scholarly communication0.0180.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207