Seminario : Interrogar su fuente

2019· article· es· W6918179079 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2019

Typearticle

Languagees

FieldSocial Sciences

TopicLiterary and Philosophical Studies

Canadian institutionsnot available

Fundersnot available

KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Set (abstract data type)Selection (genetic algorithm)Perspective (graphical)Product (mathematics)

DOI10.58079/teda

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tolosa : MDR 15 de marzo de 2019 9h30-12h30 Séminaire CEIIBA "Interroger sa source" : « Construction de stéréotypes » Emilie Cadez (UT2J, CEIIBA), « L’ennemi Apache » Shems Kasmi (UT2J, CEIIBA), « Construction de l'image des métis au XVIe siècle (Amérique, Nouvelle-Grenade) » Gabriella Serban (UT2J, LLA-CREATIS), « Stéréotypes de genres dans le théâtre colombien contemporain » Alina Castellanos (Univ. Bordeaux-Montaigne, AMERIBER) "Comment interroger l’archive judiciaire ? Les langages jurid...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001

metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000

Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated

Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none

Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none

GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none

Teacher disagreement score0.941

Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

Category	Codex	Gemma
Metaresearch	0.001	0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)	0.001	0.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)	0.001	0.000
Bibliometrics	0.000	0.001
Science and technology studies	0.001	0.001
Scholarly communication	0.001	0.015
Open science	0.001	0.000
Research integrity	0.000	0.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)	0.024	0.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021

GPT teacher head0.281

Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work

Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0

Published2019

Admission routes1

Has abstractyes

Download record (JSON)Report an issue with this record

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)→Same topicLiterary and Philosophical Studies→French-language works237,207→