MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6920283155 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.11705007

The fishes of the Central Canadian Rockies Ecosystem

2020· book· en· W6920283155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2020
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFish migrationIntroduced speciesTroutHabitatWildlifeSubspeciesWildlife conservationNative forestAlien

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I surveyed existing information in historical documents; technical publications and reports; selected file data held by Parks Canada, Alberta Fish and Wildlife and the British Columbia Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks; and interviewed reliable observers knowledgeable about selected waters to determine the native and present distribution of fishes within the Central Canadian Rockies Ecosystem (CCRE). Fifty-four species of fishes in 12 families have been reported to exist in or near the CCRE. Of these, only 33 are, or once were, native to some part of the study area or in connected adjacent waters. At least 10 native fishes have suffered impacts of significant conservation concern. One native subspecies (Banff longnose dace) is now extinct. One native species (chinook salmon) is certainly extirpated in the CCRE. Several other anadromous species (Pacific lamprey, white sturgeon, sockeye and steelhead stocks) native to the study area in the Columbia River mainstem or adjacent connected waters presumably are extirpated or landlocked. Many individual stocks of native fish also have been extirpated. Cutthroat trout and bull trout native stocks especially have been eliminated or severely depleted: both are now rare in most of the Bow River drainage. In particular, genetically-pure stocks of native westslope cutthroat trout in their native habitats are exceedingly rare and should be treated as endangered. A limited number of cutthroat stocks have been successfully introduced into previously fish-free drainages above barriers. Of the 21 introduced species, at least 13 have managed to persist somewhere within the CCRE. Introduced brook and brown trout have been especially successful, largely replacing native cutthroat and bull trout in many east slopes waters. Most rainbow trout stocks introduced into the upper Bow drainage evidently have failed to persist in the long term, but have introgressed extensively with native westslope cutthroats, especially in the Bow mainstem, Jumpingpound Creek, Elbow, Sheep and Highwood river drainages. Introduced lake trout stocks have replaced native bull trout in at least two BNP lakes even though certain native stocks of these two species coexist elsewhere in the CCRE. An introduced stock of northern Dolly Varden may pose a threat to a native bull trout stock being restored in the upper Kananaskis drainage. One introduced stock (cisco in Lake Minnewanka) derived from the Great Lakes may be of special value for conservation because stocks in lakes Ontario and Erie are thought to be endangered. The present fish fauna of the CCRE is overwhelmingly artificial, depauperate and dominated by exotic stocks; the native fish fauna largely obliterated. The ecological integrity of the natural Central Rockies Ecosystem has been irretrievably lost. A system of triage is required to salvage whatever remains of the natural state. A new set of ecosystem boundaries based on regional watersheds is proposed within which to organize aquatic ecosystem conservation and management in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→