MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6920360101 · doi:10.60692/nhqp8-bpc08

Major lung resection for carcinoid tumor; Does it affect quality of life?

2023· article· en· W6920360101 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreater South Information System · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarcinoid tumorsStage (stratigraphy)Lung cancerResection marginLungQuality of life (healthcare)Pulmonary function testingCardiothoracic surgeryGold standard (test)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Pulmonary carcinoid is rare with surgery remaining the gold standard treatment which may include radical lung resection as well as minimally invasive procedures and parenchymal sparing bronchial resection. However, resection may impact patients' daily activities due to decreased lung volume reserve and postoperative pain. Our study aims to compare the impact of different types of surgical resection on the post-operative quality of life with the application of a strict peri-operative pulmonary care program. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors in a tertiary cancer center between August, 2017 and March, 2020 were included. For the qualitative and quantitative assessment of pain and quality of life, we utilized the Arabic version of Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) instrument respectively. Lung reserve was assessed before and after surgery. Statistical analysis conducted on SPSS version 24. Results: A total of 16 patients underwent different type of resection. The majority were males (n=10; 63%) with a mean age of 44 years (19-81). Most common clinical stage was stage I (n=12, 75%) with typical carcinoid features recorded in more than half of the cases (n=11, 69%). Almost all patients underwent surgical excision (n=15, 94%) with negative resection margin and no major post-operative complications. Bilobectomy was the most frequent procedure (n=6, 40%) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was utilized in 8 patients (50%). Expected changes were recorded in pre- and postoperative pulmonary function test. The majority of patients (n=15, 94%) were totally independent. Mild intermittent pain was found in 7 patients (44%) who scored an average intensity of 1.6 out of 10. Conclusions: Excellent long-term outcomes can be achieved following surgical resection of pulmonary carcinoid tumors with little to no effect on patients' lung function and quality of life in regard to performance status and post-operative pain when a good peri-operative pulmonary, physical rehabilitation, and pain management programs are adopted and strictly implemented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreater South Information SystemSame topicAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsFrench-language works237,207