Arima Modeling and Forecasting of Banana Production in Eastern Visayas, Philippines: 2010-2022
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This time series study investigated the quarterly banana production among the six provinces in Eastern Visayas, Philippines namely: Biliran, Leyte, Southern Leyte, Samar, Eastern Samar, and Northern Samar from 2010 to 2022 specifically the time series components of the data, appropriate time series model, projected banana production for 2023-2024, and the comparison of the predictive accuracy of forecasted models. The technique employs a descriptive and predictive study design of the secondary data from the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) using descriptive statistics, time series charts, Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models, forecasting, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE). Among the six provinces, Samar (148,352.78 mt) had the highest total volume of banana production, followed by Southern Leyte (819,306.59 mt). The highest banana production was observed among provinces, namely: 3 rd quarter of 2013 in Biliran, 2 nd quarter of 2010 in Eastern Samar, 3 rd quarter of 2012 in Leyte, 2 nd quarter of 2014 in Northern Samar, 1 st quarter of 2022 in Samar, and 4 th quarter of 2012 in Southern Leyte. In terms of the overall banana production, seasonality was found in quarters from 2010-2022 with irregular variations and gradual increases. All provinces showed ADF statistics that are negative and p-values that are below the 0.05 threshold, suggesting that the time series for each province is stationary. With ARIMA models being assessed and validated for each province, Eastern Samar (ARIMA(4,1,1)) model has the lowest AIC and BIC values indicating the best fit among the models. Overall ARIMA (3,1,2) model forecasts in Eastern Visayas will experience fluctuations but maintain general stability until 2024. Further, the predictive accuracy using MAE, MAPE, and SMAPE was determined to compare the resulting ARIMA models of the quarterly banana production, hence, the findings revealed variable model accuracies across different provinces with Northern Samar showing the highest accuracy. Thus, the different models and forecasted productions found in this study are important to ensure market stability and consistent supplies of banana production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".