MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6920404355 · doi:10.6068/dp163ba27a77617

Trend 1980 - 2006. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Gender Statistics [Archive]: Death Rate by Cause | Country: Austria | Selection 1: 45 - 64 | Selection 2: Both sexes, 1980-2006. Data Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference: A SAGE Publishing Resource Dataset-ID: 054-003-053.

2018· other· en· W6920404355 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Planet · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionOfficial statisticsSelection (genetic algorithm)Mortality ratePublishingInternational comparisonsEconomic dataSummary statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2018). Gender Statistics [Archive]: Death Rate by Cause | Country: Austria | Selection 1: 45 - 64 | Selection 2: Both sexes, 1980-2006. Data Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference: A SAGE Publishing Resource [Dataset]. Dataset-ID: 054-003-053. Dataset: Shows death rate, by cause and sex. The Gender Statistics database presents sex-disaggregated social data for the 56 member states of the United National Economic Commission on Europe (UNECE) region, which include the countries of Europe, but also Canada, the United States, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Israel. The data covers the Common Gender Indicators for the UNECE region as well as the data series that are used to calculate these indicators. The data have been supplied by national statistical offices through the network of Gender Statistics Focal Points, and are compiled by the Statistical Division of the UNECE Secretariat from different official national and international sources. Data available varies by country. NOTE: Data-Planet discontinued updating of this dataset in 2011 due to irregularities in the data structure. For more recent data on similar topics, please see the Eurostat database. Diseases and external causes of death are coded differently in different versions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). For many diseases it is not possible to identify codes in different classification systems that would correspond precisely to the same disease or groups of diseases. Often the change in the trend of a certain cause-specific mortality rate may be the result of a changing ICD version or national death certification and coding practices, rather than an actual change in the mortality. It should be noted that mortality rates for some countries may be biased due to the under-registration of death cases. The basic principle of selection of the 25 CoD for presentation in the UNECE Gender Database is to include one main SDR for each of the ICD chapters and also to focus on some of the leading CoD across the European Region and some specific causes with high gender differences. Category: Health and Vital Statistics, International Relations and Trade Source: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) was established in 1947 as one of the five regional economic commissions of the United Nations. Its major aim is to promote pan-European economic integration. To do so, UNECE brings together 56 countries located in the European Union, non-EU Western and Eastern Europe, South-East Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and North America. All these countries dialogue and cooperate under the aegis of the UNECE on economic and sectoral issues. http://www.unece.org/ Subject: Death Rates, Gender, Diseases

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.018
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1120.129

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Planet→French-language works237,207→