MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6920466581 · doi:10.60713/pist-186988

Étude, conception et réalisation d’un pavé tactile innovant à base d’illusion haptique

2023· report· fr· W6920466581 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTunisian Scientific and Technical Information Portal · 2023
Typereport
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTactile stimuliBase (topology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce rapport a été élaboré dans le cadre d’un projet de fin d’études à l’École de Technologie Supérieure au Canada, financé par l’organisme canadien Mitacs, dans le but d’obtenir un diplôme national en génie mécatronique de l’École Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Carthage. L’objectif de ce projet est la conception et le développement d’un pavé tactile innovant offrant une expérience tactile immersive en créant des vibrations haptiques en réponse aux appuis effectués sur le pavé tactile, en combinant habilement des éléments matériels et logiciels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTunisian Scientific and Technical Information PortalFrench-language works237,207