Cribado neurocognitivo en familiares de personas con deterioro cognitivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PROBLEMA: el sedentarismo y/o baja actividad física está relacionado con casos de deterioro cognitivo leve en personas adultas, no asociados a la edad. OBJETIVO: determinar la relación entre el deterioro cognitivo leve, y el sedentarismo en adultos, familiares de pacientes geriátricos con deterioro cognitivo diagnosticado. MÉTODO: se eligieron familiares de pacientes geriátricos con deterioro cognitivo diagnosticado, en edades comprendidas entre los 30-60 años de edad, aplicándoseles el Cuestionario Internacional de Actividad Física para medir la actividad física y la evaluación cognitiva de Montreal para identificar deterioro cognitivo leve. RESULTADOS: no se encuentra relación significativa entre la baja actividad física y la aparición del deterioro cognitivo leve. CONCLUSIÓN: se concluye que no hay relación significativa entre deterioro cognitivo y baja actividad física, pero sí signos de alarma para la población entre 40-60 años en quienes se encontraron deterioro cognitivo leve, especialmente en el dominio de memoria, fluidez verbal, cálculo y habilidades visoespaciales, los cuales podrían estar asociados a una baja escolarización.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".