Additional file 1 of A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of rapid on-site influenza and respiratory syncytial virus PCR testing in paediatric and adult populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Table S1. Validation of nasopharyngeal aspirates tested on the Xpert® Xpress Flu/RSV compared to standard nucleic acid testing. Table S2. Summary of discrepant results for ACH and PLC studies. Table S3. Oseltamivir utilization for emergency department patients. Table S4. Percent oseltamivir ordered before and after the ROST result was reported by virus detected. Table S5. Percentage of emergency department patients receiving a chest radiograph, antibiotics or number of laboratory tests ordered. Table S6. Percent chest radiographs ordered before and after the ROST result was reported by virus detected. Table S7. Percent antimicrobial ordered before and after the ROST result was reported by virus detected. Figure S1. Influenza A, influenza B, and RSV cases by Flu week for 2019–2020 for Calgary Health Zone. Figure S2. Survival curves for time to discharge of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.707 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".