An Interplay Between Post-Traumatic Epilepsy and Associated Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a devastating neurological outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI), which may negatively impact the quality of life of patients with TBI, and may impose a huge socioeconomic burden. This burden may be due to long-term functional outcomes associated with PTE, particularly cognitive dysfunction. To date, the relationship between TBI and PTE remains unclear, with little known about how the effect of their link on cognitive function as well.Thus, this systematic review aimed at elucidating the relationship between PTE and cognitive impairment in adults after TBI based on available clinical studies, in hopes to aid in the development of therapeutic strategies for PTE.A systematic literature search was performed using 6 databases; MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Psych INFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane to retrieve relevant clinical studies investigating the link between PTE and cognition in the context of TBI. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the methodological quality of relevant studies.A total of six eligible studies were included for critical appraisal in this review after performing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, which involved 1,100 individuals, from 1996 to 2021. The selected studies were derived from the civilian and military population, with a follow-up period that ranged from 6 months to 35 years. The average quality of the involved studies was moderate (6.6, SD = 1.89). Five out of six studies found poorer cognitive performance in people with PTE, compared with those without PTE. Although the association between PTE and cognitive impairment was insignificant after controlling for specific covariates, there was a statistical trend toward significance.This systematic review suggests that there may be a possible link between PTE and cognitive decline in TBI patients, with the latter being reported to occur up to 35 years post injury. Variations in sample sizes, follow-up periods, and neuropsychological assessment tools may be the limitations affecting the interpretation and significance of this relationship. Therefore, future studies with standard cognitive assessment tools may be warranted to solidify the link between TBI-PTE-cognitive dysfunction, prior to the development of therapeutic strategies.Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020221702, prospero identifier: CRD42020221702.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".