MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6920699310 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24136224

Additional file 1 of N-acetylglucosamine inhibits inflammation and neurodegeneration markers in multiple sclerosis: a mechanistic trial

2023· article· en· W6920699310 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytokineFlow cytometryCD8Cytotoxic T cellInflammationIL-2 receptorCytokine release syndromeCytometryImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Baseline HexNAc and cytokine levels. A–E) Average HexNAc (A) and cytokine (B–E) levels from the 4 weekly visits prior to GlcNAc treatment separated by MS subtype. HexNAc measured by LC–MS/MS and IFNg, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-10 levels measured by sandwich ELISA. Only cytokine levels above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were included in analysis. Each dot represents an individual subject. Error bars reflect SEM. P values were measured by two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction. Figure S2. Lymphocyte flow cytometry gating strategy. Activated blasting T cells were identified among the large cells. All CD4 and CD8 cells identified in the large gate were confirmed to be T cells by staining for CD3. L-PHA staining of large CD4+CD25+ blasting T cells with pretreatment in black and during GlcNAc treatment in red. Figure S3. N-glycan branching on resting lymphocytes with oral GlcNAc treatment. A–L) Averaged change in L-PHA binding to resting CD4+CD25–T cells, resting CD8+ T cells and resting CD19+ B cells by flow cytometry assessed before (visits 1–4), during (visits 5–8), and after (visits 9–11) GlcNAc treatment individually (A–C, G–I) or combined (D–F, J–L). Change in L-PHA MFI is relative to baseline (V1–4). P value by linear mixed models (two-tailed) using all subjects who completed the study. Figure S4. Changes in serum neurofilament light chain (sNfl) and clinical disability (EDSS) with oral GlcNAc . A–C) Average sNfL levels measured by SIMOA from the 4 visits prior to GlcNAc treatment separated by HexNAc (A) MS subtype (B) or baseline HexNAc (C). Error bars are SEM. P values by two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction. D–G) Averaged sNfL before (V1–4), during (V5–8), and after (V9–11) oral GlcNAc individually (D,E) or combined (F,G) in subjects with median baseline sNfL < 11.07pg/ml. n=8 and n=8 in the 6g (D,F) and 12g (E,G) cohorts, respectively. sNfL measured by SIMOA. P value by linear mixed modeling (one-tailed) in subjects who completed the study. H–I) Shown is EDSS scores at baseline (average of V1 and V4), after 4 weeks of GlcNAc (visit 8) or 4 weeks after stopping GlcNAc (visit 11). P value by one-tailed Wilcoxon paired test in the intention to treat cohort ITT. Table S1. Modified CONSORT checklist for pilot randomized clinical trials (Sections 8–12 on randomization removed).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7930.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→