Transfiguracje labiryntu. Absurd w poetyce Franza Kafki i Nikołaja Gogola [The Transfigurations of the Labyrinth. Absurdity in the Poetics of Franz Kafka and Nikolai Gogol]
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<b>Świerczyński, Filip (2021). „Transfiguracje labiryntu. Absurd w poetyce Franza Kafki i Nikołaja Gogola”. </b><b><i>Studia Rossica Gedanensia</i></b><b>,</b><b> 8, ss. 175–204. DOI: </b>https://doi.org/10.26881/SRG.2021.8.11<b>POL: </b>Artykuł stanowi rozwinięcie i dopełnienie badań zaprezentowanych w pracy <i>Ściany labiryntu. Systemy narracyjne Franza Kafki i Nikołaja Gogola</i> (Świerczyński 2020). Jego głównym celem jest zarówno przedstawienie i analiza gogolowskich inspiracji Franza Kafki (1883–1924), przede wszystkim na płaszczyźnie poetyki, jak i ugruntowanie świadomości owych wpływów, w granicach polskiego literaturoznawstwa, dotychczas raczej w nim niedostrzeganych. Punkt wyjścia stanowi analiza pojęcia absurdu w recepcji współczesnych badaczy ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem jego rozumienia przedłożonego przez Alberta Camusa (1913–1960). Autor prezentuje poszczególne filary konstrukcyjne stanowiące o absurdzie obecnym w diegezie utworów Kafki i Gogola (1809–1852), ogniskując swoją uwagę na jej dialektyczności, wszechobecności przemiany czy inherentnej niepewności stanowiącej rdzeń <i>metafizycznego horroru</i>, w jakim zmuszeni są funkcjonować Kafkowscy i Gogolowscy bohaterowie.<b>ENG:</b> This paper continues and supplements the research presented in the article “Ściany labiryntu. Systemy narracyjne Franza Kafki i Nikołaja Gogola” (Świerczyński 2020: 132–145). Its main purpose is both to present and analyse the Gogolian inspirations of Franz Kafka (1883–1924), primarily in the field of poetics, and to establish the awareness of these influences within the framework of Polish literary studies, rather unnoticed so far. The starting point is an analysis of the concept of absurdity in the reception of contemporary researchers, with particular emphasis on its understanding proposed by Albert Camus (1913–1960). The author presents the individual structural pillars that constitute absurdity in the works of Kafka and Gogol (1809–1852), focusing his attention on its dialecticality, the omnipresence of metamorphosis or inherent uncertainty, constituting the core of the <i>metaphysical horror</i> in which Kafka’s and Gogol’s characters are forced to function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it