MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6920710169 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13346506

Additional file 1 of Postoperative hypotension in patients discharged to the intensive care unit after non-cardiac surgery is associated with adverse clinical outcomes

2020· article· en· W6920710169 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensive care unitTable (database)CohortConfoundingHazard ratioAdverse effectIntensive careCohort studyOperating table

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1. Figure S1. Initial attrition diagram leading into cohort selection for current study. Method S1. Brief description of the machine learning approach to identify patients discharged to the ICU for patients with an undocumented post-surgery care location. Table S1. Comorbidities and additional cohort patient characteristics. Table S2. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Table S3. List of antihypertensive drug classes. Table S4. Multivariate model results. Table S5. P-values of hazard ratios for primary and secondary outcomes. Table S6. E-values to assess the magnitude of an unobserved or unaccounted confounding effect for postoperative hypotension in intensive care unit setting. Table S7. Hazard/Incidence rate ratios and p-values for length-of-stay and use of intensive care unit-specific endpoints for intensive care unit patients with postoperative hypotension (exploratory outcomes).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207