MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6920748145 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27124226

Additional file 4 of Molecular characterization of Streptococcus suis isolates recovered from diseased pigs in Europe

2024· article· en· W6920748145 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogenetic treeStreptococcus suisMultilocus sequence typingSerotypeWhole genome sequencingTypingGenomeGeneGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 4. Phylogenetic relationships based on core-genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and genomic traits of the 251 Streptococcus suis isolates using a different reference genome. This figure presents a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree (left panel), constructed using 8,611 non-redundant core-genome SNP loci identified relative to the genome sequence of the ST16 serotype 9 reference strain GD-0088. This analysis confirms the findings depicted in Figure 3, using a different reference to provide comparative insights. The tree highlights several distinct clades, emphasizing the genetic diversity among the isolates. For reference, the serotype of each isolate, along with the genotypes determined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), are annotated along the tree, showing their association with specific genomic clades. The right panel depicts the presence (in purple) or absence (in light blue) of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes and virulence-associated genes (VAGs), as determined from the whole-genome sequences of each isolate. “UT” denotes an untypable isolate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8340.137

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments→French-language works237,207→