MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Additional file 1 of Concerted phenotypic flexibility of avian erythrocyte size and number in response to dietary anthocyanin supplementation

2024· article· en· W6920822729 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBird parasitology and diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRed blood cellRed CellCellAnthocyaninCell sizeBlood cellMean difference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Standardized effect sizes in response to anthocyanin-rich diet among non-flying (A) and flying starlings (B); in response to wind-tunnel flight activity among control-(C) and anthocyanin-diet (D) fed starlings. Effect size higher or lower than 0 indicates respectively higher or lower values among anthocyanin supplemented (panel A and B) or flying birds (panel C and D). Circles and squares depict directly measured and calculated variables respectively. Colors: light grey, dark grey and black indicate small (d ≥ 0.2), medium (d ≥ 0.5) and large effect (d ≥ 0.8) sizes following Cohen [138]. Standardized effect size (Cohen’s d) are reported with their 95% confidence interval. The detailed effect size estimates are described in the Additional file 1: Table S1. Hct Haematocrit; Hb content Haemoglobin content; RBCcount Red blood cell number; RBCarea Red blood cell surface area; MCH Mean cell haemoglobin; MCHC Mean cell haemoglobin concentration; MCV Mean cell volume; SA:V ratio Surface-area-to-volume ratio; TSAE Total surface area of erythrocytes; Hb:TSAE ratio Haemoglobin-to-total-surface-area-of-erythrocytes ratio. RBCmajor Red blood cell major length; RBCminor Red blood cell minor axis length; RBCar Red blood cell aspect ratio; RBCcirc Red blood cell circularity. Table S1. Effect size estimates (% change, absolute change and standardized Cohen’s d) for the comparisons of experimental groups (conditional effects) for all haematological variables considered in this study. Hct Haematocrit; Hb content Haemoglobin content; RBCcount Red blood cell number; RBCarea Red blood cell surface area; MCH Mean cell haemoglobin; MCHC Mean cell haemoglobin concentration; MCV Mean cell volume; SA:V ratio Surface-area-to-volume ratio; TSAE Total surface area of erythrocytes; Hb:TSAE ratio Haemoglobin-to-total-surface-area-of-erythrocytes ratio. RBCmajor Red blood cell major length; RBCminor Red blood cell minor axis length; RBCar Red blood cell aspect ratio; RBCcirc Red blood cell circularity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8300.126

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicBird parasitology and diseasesFrench-language works237,207