MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6920827346 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24779259

Additional file 1 of Identifying a target group for selenium supplementation in high-risk cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of the SUSTAIN CSX trial

2023· article· en· W6920827346 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of TorontoKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaseline (sea)SeleniumRenal functionGlutathione peroxidaseCreatinine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: S1: Outcomes in all patients. S2: Baseline selenium levels in Canada and Germany. S3: Baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients with baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m2. S4: Baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients with baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 90 ml/min/1.73 m2. S5: Baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients with selenium baseline levels < 70 µg/l. S6: Baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients with glutathione peroxidase (GPx3) baseline activity < 250 µg/l.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9590.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207