MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thesis Title: Assessing the Feasibility of Medical Practice Franchises in the Current Policy Environment

2020· article· en· W6920831031 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFranchising Strategies and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLicenseDocumentationHealth carePopulationQuality (philosophy)FranchiseMedical practiceBusiness practice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The state of the healthcare system in this country, most would agree, is tumultuous. The United States spends the most and has the least effective medical care among all developed countries, and three-fourths of our population believe we need major, potentially reconstructive changes to our healthcare system. Specifically, this thesis investigates the franchise model, a business format praised for its efficiency, and its potential utilization to deliver a standard, high quality of health care to populations across the country. The franchise model is a method for expanding a business by opening identical, chain-like operations in various locations and distributing services through a licensing relationship. The franchisor, the licensor, grants a license to the franchisee to conduct business under the brand and trademark of the franchisor. A franchisee generally operates one location, or unit, and reports back to the franchisor in this contractual relationship. While the number of medical practice franchises that currently exist worldwide varies due to the rapid entry and exit of firms in this market and the lack of documentation for many firms, the estimated number is two-hundred firms. Based on the same sources, the approximate distribution is 75 medical practice franchises in the United States and Canada, 45 in Europe, and 80 in Asian and African countries. Despite this quantity, very little literature documenting the evolution, nature and environment of these organizations exists. . Despite this quantity, very little literature documenting the evolution, nature and environment of these organizations exists. As medical practice franchises are a unique delivery format at the intersection of business and medicine, understanding the purpose and structure of these organizations and their evolution in the healthcare sphere is of great importance, especially in a time of high demand for better healthcare delivery solutions. In a period of increasing provider consolidation driven by payment reform, the franchise model offers an alternative for physicians who want to maintain autonomy. This thesis attempts to describe the nature, environment, and trends of medical practice franchises using a structured electronic search. Two theories of organizational environment are used to help frame this analysis: resource dependence theory and institutional theory. <br>The three foci of this thesis are: A. To describe key organizational trends of the medical practice franchise within published industry reports, scholarly literature, and news reports on medical practice franchises and medical care organizations. B. To describe the organizational environment of medical practice franchises in the United States, especially the legal and regulatory policies impacting medical practice franchises. C. To explore the utility of institutional theory to explain variation in the development of medical practice franchises in the United States. <br>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it