MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6920875830 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14260988

Metadata record for the article: TCERG1L allelic variation is associated with cisplatin-induced hearing loss in childhood cancer, a PanCareLIFE study

2021· other· en· W6920875830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortHearing lossOtotoxicityPharmacogenomicsRetrospective cohort studyAdverse effectCohort studyGenetic testing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This metadata record provides details of the data supporting the claims of the related article: “TCERG1L allelic variation is associated with cisplatin-induced hearing loss in childhood cancer, a PanCareLIFE study”.The related study used a genome-wide association (GWAS) approach to investigate genetic susceptibility to cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in paediatric cancer patients. The study identified a genetic variant in the gene TCERG1L (rs893507) as being associated with hearing loss in this patient cohort.<br>Type of data: GWAS summary statistics; Mus musculus gene expression dataSubject of data: Homo sapiens - cisplatin-treated, non-cranial irradiated patientsSample size: 390 participantsPopulation characteristics:PCL discovery cohort (n=390): median age at diagnosis 11.1 years (0.0-18.8); median age at audiological testing 11.8 years (0.3-19.0); median total cumulative dose cisplatin 480 mg/m2 (range: 40-950 mg/m2). 76 (19.5%) patients had been treated with additional carboplatin. 168 (43.1%) patients developed Muenster ≥2b hearing loss.Canadian first replication cohort (n=192): median age at diagnosis 4.1 years (0.1-18.8); median cumulative dose cisplatin 400 mg/m2 (300-480 mg/m2). 115 patients (59.9%) developed Muenster ≥2b hearing loss.PCL second replication cohort (n=188): median age at diagnosis 11.1 years (0.3-18.0); median cumulative dose of cisplatin 480 mg/m2 (83-770); 94 survivors (50%) developed Muenster ≥2b hearing loss.Recruitment: PCL discovery cohort and PCL second replication cohort: Study participants were recruited through the PCL network consisting of 14 institutions from 7 countries: Switzerland, Italy, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands.Canadian children replication cohort: participants were recruited via the Canadian Pharmacogenomics Network for Drug Safety (CPNDS), a national research and patients care network established to reduce serious adverse drug reactions in children.Data for this study was collected prospectively as well as retrospectively. Selection bias could have occurred in the retrospective collection of data. As a result of missing or unclassifiable audiograms, some patients could not be included due to a missing phenotype. Because many of the patients with missing audiograms might have had good hearing function, they might therefore no longer had follow-up(s) for audiometric testing, As a consequence, the odds of ototoxicity based on the results of this study could have been slightly overestimated.Date of data collection: January 2015 to October 2017 Geographic location: Netherlands; Canada; Germany<br><b>Data access</b>Summary statistics from GWAS analyses of participant blood and saliva samples (Meijer_01032021_cisplatin_induced_hearing_loss.tsv) are openly available from the GWAS Catalog: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/studies/GCST90013831.<br>Gene expression profiling data from mouse tissues in response to cisplatin treatment, are openly available from Gene Expression Omnibus: https://identifiers.org/geo:GSE117167.<br>Further data from this study cannot be made openly available due to restrictions based on privacy regulations and informed consent of the participants in Europe and Canada. Requests for data access should be sent to the principal investigator of each cohort.<br><b>Corresponding authors for this study</b>MM van den Heuvel-Eibrink (m.m.vandenheuvel-eibrink@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl) – PCL discovery cohortBruce Carleton (bcarleton@popi.ubc.ca) – Canadian replication cohortOliver Zolk (Oliver.Zolk@mhb-fontane.de) – PCL replication cohortAndries Nagtegaal (a.nagtegaal@erasmusmc.nl) - CHARGE cohort<br><b>Study approval </b>The PanCareLIFE study was approved by the local ethics committees:• Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern, 362/2015• Comitate Etico Regionale, 507REG2014• Ethical Committee University Hospital Brno, June 11, 2016• Ethics Committee Fakultni Nemocnice v Motole Prague, EK-1447/14• De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer Region Hovedstaden, H-1-2014-125• Ethikkommission Medizinische Universität Graz, 27-015 ex 14/15• Ethikkommission der Universität Ulm, 160/17• Ethikkommission der Universität zu Lübeck, 14/181• Ethik-Kommission der Ärztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 2014-619• Medische Ethische Toetsings Commissie Erasmus MC, MEC-2014-633• Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie, 2015_202<br>European Union Seventh Framework Programme (602030)<br>CPNDS studies were approved by the Canadian Research Ethics Board (i H04-70358)<br>All participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study and to have their information obtained from treating physicians.<br>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareFrench-language works237,207