Additional file 9 of A minimized symbiotic gene set from the 1.68 Mb pSymB chromid of Sinorhizobium meliloti reveals auxiliary symbiotic loci
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 9: Fig. S5. Phenotypic assessment of alfalfa nodules for SmB1.0 grown in Leonard jars with and without exogenous cobalt. Plants were grown for 35 days in a sand/vermiculite medium with Jensen’s solution with and without 2 μM cobalt. (A) Number of nodules present on each plant (n = 18) for wild type, SmB1.0, and a strain lacking pSymB entirely (ΔpSymB) grown with and without additional cobalt. Only a slight increase in nodules for SmB1.0 with cobalt was observed. (B) Nodule fresh weight averaged per nodule per plant (n = 18) inoculated with either wild type or SmB1.0. No differences were observed between the treatments. (C) Shoot dry weight of alfalfa plants inoculated with strains missing the cbtJKL operon showed little difference with the addition of cobalt to the Jensen’s solution. Assessments were made using one-way ANOVA with a Šidák correction. *p < 0.05.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.818 | 0.218 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".