MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6921000801 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1441074

Poster : A new T dwarf bona fide member of AB Doradus

2015· other· en· W6921000801 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience Mission DirectorateChina National Textile and Apparel CouncilNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion LaboratoryUniversity of California, Los AngelesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIdentity (music)Interpretation (philosophy)AdorationFace (sociological concept)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poster presented at "In the Spirit of Lyot 2015" conference taking place in Montreal on June 22-26, 2015. It describes the discovery that SDSS 1110+0116 is a ~10-12 Jupiter-mass T-type bona fide member of the ~120 Myr-old AB Doradus moving group. Please refer to the paper below if you use material from this poster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1750.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→