MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Additional file 1 of ABT-MPNN: an atom-bond transformer-based message-passing neural network for molecular property prediction

2024· article· en· W6921102547 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)Atom (system on chip)Task (project management)Artificial neural networkProperty (philosophy)Bond

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Table S1. Atom and bond features. Table S2. 200 Molecular descriptors generated by RDKit. Table S3. Algorithm of Bond Attention. Table S4. Algorithm of Atom Attention. Fig. S1. Comparison of ablation experiments using 5-fold cross-validation (A) Performance evaluation of each fold for the classification task (ClinTox) measured with AUROC. Experiments settings: #1: baseline; #2: use bond attention (Transformer); #3: use bond attention (Fastformer); #4 use atom attention; #5 use atom attention with inter-atomic matrices #6 use bond attention (Fastformer) and atom attention; #7 use bond attention (Fastformer) and atom attention with inter-atomic matrices (B) Performance evaluation of each fold for the regression task (ESOL) measured by RMSE. The settings of each experiment in the regression task are identical to those in the classification one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9670.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it