MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Additional file 1 of A quantitative evaluation of the impact of vaccine roll-out rate and coverage on reducing deaths: insights from the first 2 years of COVID-19 epidemic in Iran

2024· article· en· W6921159576 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsUnited Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCounterfactual thinkingVaccinationConfidence intervalPer capitaMortality rateExcess mortalityLife tableTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Additional file 1: Table S1. A timeline of vaccine imports to Iran from 3 February 2021 to 16 November 2021. Table S2. Total number of administered doses of COVID-19 vaccines in Iran per vaccine name by 29 May 2022 [58]. Table S3. Iran’s vaccine roll-out dates per age-group [32]. Figure S1. Deaths averted by vaccination for upper and lower middle income countries, including Iran, up to 8 December 2021. Data on deaths averted per person and per vaccine are downloaded from [3]. The economic status of each country is based on the World Bank income groups in 2020 [28]. Figure S2. Association between reported cases, deaths, and excess deaths over time and with respect to variants of SARS-CoV-2. (A) Reported cases, deaths, and excess deaths (as quantified by the sum of excess deaths per age group) as percentage of highest peak (Delta) in Iran over time. (B) Proportion of the total number of SARS-CoV-2 variants over time in Iran. Data obtained from [59]. Figure S3. Avertable COVID-19 deaths in Iran over time based on the per capita vaccine roll-out rates from model countries. Top panel shows Iran’s weekly excess deaths (black) and counterfactual excess deaths (magenta) had it followed the vaccination rate for each model country. Shaded areas show the 95% confidence interval for the counterfactual excess deaths based on varying degree of vaccine effectiveness against deaths. Central panel shows the avertable deaths based on vaccination rates from a given model country. It shows the difference between weekly excess deaths and counterfactual excess deaths in the top panel. Bottom panel shows the percentage of excess vaccination for a given model country relative to Iran’s vaccination rates per age group. Shaded areas in green (red) show periods where there would have been more (less) vaccination had Iran followed the vaccination rates as the model country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6290.047

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy→French-language works237,207→