MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6921184667 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14495346

GEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW AND HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF CAMBRIAN–ORDOVICIAN STRATA OF THE OUTER HUMBER ZONE, WESTERN NEWFOUNDLAND

2021· article· en· W6921184667 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKerogenOil shaleSource rockClastic rockSedimentary rockPetroleumMaturity (psychological)PaleozoicTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Naturally occurring hydrocarbon seeps and shows have been documented along the coast of western Newfoundlandthrough the 1800s. Historically, hydrocarbon exploration and drilling have targeted conventional oil and gas resources withinCambrian–Ordovician sedimentary rocks of the western (outer) part of the Humber (tectonostratigraphic) Zone. However,to date, the hydrocarbon potential of western Newfoundland has not been fully evaluated, even though much of the Cambro-Ordovician rocks of the outer Humber Zone reside within the oil-window. Earlier studies described and illustrated a successfulpetroleum play within the western part of the zone and proposed two petroleum fairways; one extensional, the otherinversional, with reservoirs anticipated to be principally in the lower autochthonous Paleozoic shelf rocks.The Cambro-Ordovician Green Point shale (part of the Green Point Formation, Cow Head Group of the Taconic HumberArm Allochthon) is the principal source rock for hydrocarbons in western Newfoundland; thick sections of these rocks areknown, and have potential as an unconventional shale resource. Previous geochemical studies have shown that the shales arerich in Type BI organic matter of mostly algal origin and Type I/II Kerogen and that the chemistry of its oils are similar tothose of the oil seeps and is consistent with a pre-Devonian clastic source rock. Regional geochemistry studies indicate thatthe shale ranges from thermally immature to mature (possibly ranging up to overmature) and that thermal maturity increases(at surface) from west to east and from south to north (late mature); Green Point shale, occurring north of Parson’s Pond,may reside in the gas window.The Green Point shale was complexly deformed during multiple tectonic events and its distribution, stratigraphy andstructure are generally poorly understood. There is no robust model of the subsurface because of limited onshore mapping,the scarcity of well data, and the fine-grained nature of the rocks that make seismic resolution and interpretation difficult. Furtherstudy of the stratigraphy, sedimentology, geochemistry, maturity, and mineralogy, together with structural and mappingstudies of the Green Point Formation and associated rocks, would lead to a better understanding of the shale’s hydrocarbonpotential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207