Corpi d’acqua. La svolta idrofemminista di Astrida Neimanis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume deals with “hydrofeminism”, formulated by the Canadian writer Astrida Neimanis (2017), lecturer in the Department of Gender and Cultural Studies at the University of Sydney: relying on several theoretical backgrounds, such as Hélène Cixous’ and Luce Irigaray’s écriture feminine, Merleau- Ponty’s phenomenology and Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizomatics, this new philosophical paradigm presents an ecologically-engaged notion of ‘embodiment’, which Neimanis analyses from a ‘watery’ perspective, showing how a new understanding of bodies can change our attitude towards the waters of our Earth. Antonella De Vita ‘translates’ this interest for the Italian readership: after exploring in detail the main features of hydrofeminism and explaining their relevance in the context of current debates on new materialism, post-humanism and environmental humanities, the author presents her translation of the introduction of Bodies of Water. Posthuman Feminist Phenomenology (2017), and ‘translates’ Neimanis’ figuration of ‘bodies of water’ into the language of women’s visual art and performance, devotingkeen attention both to international and to Mediterranean artists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".