Supplementary material from "Deep clustering of bacterial tree images"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The field of genomic epidemiology is rapidly growing as many jurisdictions begin to deploy whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in their national or regional pathogen surveillance programs. WGS data offer a rich view of the shared ancestry of a set of taxa, typically visualized with phylogenetic trees illustrating the clusters or subtypes present in a group of taxa, their relatedness and the extent of diversification within and between them. When methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) arose and disseminated widely, phylogenetic trees of MRSA-containing types of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> had a distinctive ‘comet’ shape, with a ‘comet head’ of recently adapted drug-resistant isolates in the context of a ‘comet tail’ that was predominantly drug-sensitive. Placing an <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>) isolate in the context of such a ‘comet’ helped public health laboratories interpret local data within the broader setting of <i>S. aureus</i> evolution. In this work, we ask what other tree shapes, analogous to the MRSA comet, are present in bacterial WGS datasets. We extract trees from large bacterial genomic datasets, visualize them as images and cluster the images. We find nine major groups of tree images, including the ‘comets’, star-like phylogenies, ‘barbell’ phylogenies and other shapes, and comment on the evolutionary and epidemiological stories these shapes might illustrate.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Genomic population structures of microbial pathogens’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 1.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".