MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6921390602 · doi:10.7479/ws8v-z270/9

Bestimmungsmerkmale von Blättern | Characteristics of Leaves

2022· dataset· de· W6921390602 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMuseum für Naturkunde Berlin - Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung · 2022
Typedataset
Languagede
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEducational Reforms and Innovations
Canadian institutionsMinnow Environmental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetiole (insect anatomy)Plant productionCultivar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ein Blatt setzt sich grundsätzlich aus drei Bestandteilen zusammen: Blattgrund, Blattstiel und Blattspreite. In diesem Artikel werden einige Merkmale vorgestellt, anhand derer eine Art bestimmt werden kann. A leaf is basically made up of three components: Leaf base, petiole and leaf blade. This article presents some characteristics that can be used to determine a species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuseum für Naturkunde Berlin - Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und BiodiversitätsforschungSame topicEducational Reforms and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207