Supplementary material from "Disparate feeding mechanics between two hadrosaurid dinosaurs support the potential for niche partitioning"
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Dinosaur Park Formation (DPF) of western Canada is well known for its diverse fossil assemblage, preserving over a dozen species of large-bodied herbivorous dinosaurs. The high density of large herbivores has raised questions of how these animals were able to coexist and limit competition, leading to several studies investigating the potential for resource partitioning. In the DPF, hadrosaurids are of particular ecological significance because of their abundance, diversity, and complex feeding system. Here, we used 3D muscle reconstructions and finite element analysis to evaluate the mechanical performance of the cranium and lower jaws of the lambeosaurine Corythosaurus casuarius and the contemporaneous hadrosaurine Gryposaurus notabilis to test for the potential of resource partitioning. We found G. notabilis had larger adductor muscles than similarly sized C. casuarius, but the latter had greater mechanical efficiency, resulting in similar bite forces for similarly sized animals. The cranium of C. casuarius is more resistant to bending than G. notabilis, and exhibits a derived stress distribution likely associated with the supracranial crest. Resource partitioning between these taxa would have been primarily size-mediated, where larger G. notabilis would have been able to processes tougher plant material than smaller C. casuarius at equivalent ontogenetic stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.558 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it