IOParlspeech: A Dataset of Over 600,000 Statements on International Organizations in National Parliamentary Debates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IOParlspeech is a dataset of over 600,000 statements on international organizations (IOs) in national parliamentary debates between 1990 and 2018. The data covers six countries: Austria, Canada, Germany, United Kingdom, United States, and New Zealand. It is generated from the Parlspeech V2 dataset (Rauh and Schwalbach 2021) and from parsed speeches in the US Congress and Canadian House of Commons (Gentzkow et al. 2018, Beelen et al. 2017). Keyword in context is applied to find mentions of IOs (full names and acronyms), as well as extensive validation to remove false positives. Meta-data include information on date, speaker, party, IO mentioned, amongst others. The article 'International Organizations in National Parliamentary Debates', published at the Review of International Organizations provides illustrations of the use of IOParlspeech and introduces the data. Please see also the data documentation on Dataverse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.065 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".